Thursday, January 21, 2016

Sorkin's Rx Ltd. v. Express Scripts, Inc, et. al.

]IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN ...

www2.sidley.com/files/upload/Sorkins-Complaint.pdf

Sidley Austin
networks and patient co-pays, to the drug benefit portion of health care plans. .....restrain trade in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1,


Express Scripts Using FCA Deal To Destroy Rival, Suit Says ...

www.law360.com/.../express-scripts-using-fca-deal-to-destroy-ri...

Law360
Jan 14, 2015 - After CareMed complained to Express Scripts, the pharmacy benefitmanager allegedly ... in Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal health care programs,” the lawsuit says. ... unjust enrichment, breach of contract and violations of theSherman Act and New York antitrust law. ... The case is Sorkin's Rx Ltd. v.

Express Scripts facing antitrust, contract complaint - St ...

www.bizjournals.com/.../health-care/.../ex...

South Florida Business Journal
Jan 14, 2015 - A New York compound pharmacy has filed a federal lawsuit against ...Health Care Inc. ... Sorkin's Rx Ltd., which does business as CareMed, says that in May 2007 ... companies to secure prior authorization for the coverage of drugs. ... to allege that Express Scripts has violated the Sherman Antitrust Act


15-114 - Sorkin's Rx Ltd. v. Express Scripts, Inc. et al

https://www.gpo.gov/.../USC...

United States Government Publishing Office
Jan 20, 2015 - 15-114 - Sorkin's Rx Ltd. v. Express Scripts, Inc. et al.

Express Scripts Escapes Jilted Rival's Monopolization Suit ...

www.law360.com/.../express-scripts-escapes-jilted-rival-s-monop...

Law360
Feb 19, 2015 - Sorkin's Rx Ltd., which operates as CareMed, has dropped its suit while maintaining any future rights to file claims that Express Scripts was  ...

Sorkin's Rx Ltd. v. Express Scripts, Inc. et al - Law360

www.law360.com/cases/54b6b59ab220e062b1000001

Law360
Feb 19, 2015 - Docket activity of federal case Sorkin's Rx Ltd. v. Express Scripts, Inc. et al, case number 4:15-cv-00114, from Missouri Eastern Court.

No comments: