DISCIPLINARY CASES – Yolonda Green, Assistant General Counsel
A. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT– APPEARANCE REQUIRED CASES
A-1 Millenium Pharmacy, Inc., PH 25300. Miami, FL.
Case No. 2013-02802 - PCP: Weizer/Meshad
Respondent violated:
Count One: Section 465.023(1)(c), F.S. (2012), by violating a rule of the Board of Pharmacy, through a
violation of Rule 64B16-27.420(4)(a), F.A.C., by failing to insure a registered pharmacy technician was
properly identified.
Count Two: Section 465.023(1)(c), F.S. (2012), through a violation of Rule 64B16-28.102(5)(a), F.A.C.,
by failing to have a copy of a current Facts and Comparisons.
Count Three: Section 465.023(1)(c), F.S. (2012), by violating a rule of the Board of Pharmacy, through
a violation of Rule 64B16-28.110, F.A.C., by failing to remove from the prescription department all
pharmaceuticals which bear upon the container an expiration date which has been reached.
Count Four: Section 465.023(1)(c), F.S. (2012), by violating a rule of the Board of Pharmacy, through a
violation of Rule 64B16-28.118(4), F.A.C., because copy of inventory for purchased medication was
missing lot numbers.
Terms of Settlement Agreement: Respondent shall be present. Respondent shall pay costs limited to
$2,000.00. Respondent shall pay a fine of $1,000.00. Respondent must correct all deficiencies.
Respondent was not present.
This case was pulled by the Prosecution Services Unit.
quoted from Minutes of December 3-4, 2013 Meeting
A. SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT– APPEARANCE REQUIRED CASES
A-1 Millenium Pharmacy, Inc., PH 25300. Miami, FL.
Case No. 2013-02802 - PCP: Weizer/Meshad
Respondent violated:
Count One: Section 465.023(1)(c), F.S. (2012), by violating a rule of the Board of Pharmacy, through a
violation of Rule 64B16-27.420(4)(a), F.A.C., by failing to insure a registered pharmacy technician was
properly identified.
Count Two: Section 465.023(1)(c), F.S. (2012), through a violation of Rule 64B16-28.102(5)(a), F.A.C.,
by failing to have a copy of a current Facts and Comparisons.
Count Three: Section 465.023(1)(c), F.S. (2012), by violating a rule of the Board of Pharmacy, through
a violation of Rule 64B16-28.110, F.A.C., by failing to remove from the prescription department all
pharmaceuticals which bear upon the container an expiration date which has been reached.
Count Four: Section 465.023(1)(c), F.S. (2012), by violating a rule of the Board of Pharmacy, through a
violation of Rule 64B16-28.118(4), F.A.C., because copy of inventory for purchased medication was
missing lot numbers.
Terms of Settlement Agreement: Respondent shall be present. Respondent shall pay costs limited to
$2,000.00. Respondent shall pay a fine of $1,000.00. Respondent must correct all deficiencies.
Respondent was not present.
This case was pulled by the Prosecution Services Unit.
quoted from Minutes of December 3-4, 2013 Meeting
No comments:
Post a Comment