| 09/19/2013 | 18 | STIPULATION of Dismissal by Lowlite Investments Inc, Mark W Sturdy. (Clark, Dulijaza) (Entered: 09/19/2013) |
| 09/26/2013 | TEXT ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Parties' Stipulation to Dismiss 18 is ALLOWED. The Clerk is Directed to terminate this case. All pending motions 4 , 14 are DENIED AS MOOT. Entered by Judge Richard Mills on 9/26/13. (ME, ilcd) (Entered: 09/26/2013) |
Human Medications, Human Drugs, Animal Medications, Animal Drugs, Pharmacy law, Pharmaceutical law, Compounding law, Sterile and Non Sterile Compounding 797 Compliance, Veterinary law, Veterinary Compounding Law; Health Care; Awareness of all Types of Compounding Issues; Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs), Outsourcing Facilities Food and Drug Administration and Compliance Issues
Saturday, October 26, 2013
Dr. Mark W. Sturdy d/b/a Rochester Veterinary Clinic v. Lowlite Investments, Inc., d/b/a Olympia Pharmacy Has Been Dismissed
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
What do you think? Was he paid off to settle out of court? (settle for less than the cost of defense)?
Some people, perhaps this veterinarian, realize that filing complaints with licensing boards is a fruitless effort, so they resort to civil complaints charging Deceptive and Unfair Business Practices. Rather than spending $$$ in legal fees, the pharmacy might have agreed not to spam doctors and vets with unsolicited faxes in the future, as well as paying off the plaintiff and his lawyers' fees.
Kenneth Woliner, MD
www.holisticfamilymed.com
Post a Comment