Thursday, September 26, 2013

More Sway for F.D.A. Is Object of New Bill By SABRINA TAVERNISE Published: September 25, 2013


A bipartisan committee of lawmakers from the Senate and the House reached a compromise on Wednesday on legislation that would give the Food and Drug Administration greater control over compounding pharmacies. But analysts said it was still unclear whether the law would actually make drugs safer.
Lawmakers said the bill’s primary function was to help prevent another national health disaster like the meningitis outbreak last year that was traced to a large Massachusetts-based compounding pharmacy, a company that mixes specialty medicine. More than 60 people died and more than 700 were sickened after receiving injections of a contaminated steroid made by the pharmacy, the New England Compounding Company.
The F.D.A. has argued repeatedly that it has limited authority over compounders, which are now regulated by state boards of pharmacy, even though many ship drugs across state lines.
The bill’s authors argued that it would give the agency broader powers by placing some compounding pharmacies in a separate category that would require them to behave much like traditional drug manufacturers: to alert the authorities when something goes wrong with their products, to register with the F.D.A. and to allow agency officials into their facilities for inspection, much as traditional drug manufacturers do.
But the language of a statement issued late on Wednesday by the bill’s authors implied that companies would not be required to be part of the new category, leaving the option open to those compounding facilities “who wish” to join.
If being part of the new group is optional, that means there will be a reliance on the market to drive demand for products made under the stricter standards, said Allan Coukell, a drug policy expert at the Pew Charitable Trusts.
“It will be incumbent on the purchaser — the physician, clinic or hospital — to opt for drugs from F.D.A.-regulated facilities,” he said.
Under current law, compounders are not required to give the F.D.A. access to their books, or to allow them in to their production facilities for . About half of all the court orders the agency obtained over the past decade were for pharmacy compounders, although compounders were only a small part of the agency’s regulatory responsibilities.
A Senate staff member with knowledge of the legislation said the goal of the bill was to create an incentive for compounding pharmacies to register with the F.D.A., even though it is not a requirement for companies to do so.
continue to read here

No comments: