The Safe Drug Compounding Act of 2007 was drafted as a Senate bill. Its purpose was to redefine oversight and regulation of the practice of pharmacy compounding by giving power to the FDA to inspect all retail pharmacies that made or dispensed compounded medications and to determine whether or not compounded medications were medically necessary or "essentially copies" of existing FDA-approved medications. The draft bill also would have taken a number of steps to inhibit the distribution of compounded medications beyond state lines by requiring compounding pharmacies to provide detailed documentation on all intrastate orders and asking state pharmacy boards to "discourage the distribution of inordinate amounts of compound drug products in interstate commerce." The bill never passed.
Pharmacists and pharmacy organizations opposed the draft bill, expressing concern that
the Safe Drug Compounding Act of 2007, would restrain the practice of compounding by giving the Food & Drug Administration
authority to regulate compounding. A coalition of nine pharmacy organizations--the American Pharmacists Association, National Community Pharmacists Association, International Academy of Compounding Pharmacists (IACP), American College of Apothecaries, American Society of Consultant Pharmacists, National Alliance of State Pharmacy Associations, Massachusetts Pharmacists Association, North Carolina Association of Pharmacists, and Kansas Pharmacists Association -- drafted a letter to the bill's expected sponsors. insisting that the draft legislation "would negatively impact patient access to necessary compounded
prescription medications and create onerous, new requirements for prescribers
and pharmacists" and urging that this draft legislation not be introduced. The coalition of none pointed out the work
of the U.S. Pharmacopeia, state boards of pharmacy, and the Pharmacy Compounding
Accreditation Board (PCAB) and promised to work with Congress to address
concerns about compounding.
Compounding critics, however, wanted the draft bill to pass, insisted that the act would clarify
several issues that have been unclear since 1997 when the Supreme Court struck
down portions of the FDA Modernization Act (FDAMA) dealing with compounding, and claimed it would help correct the problems and dangers associated with pharmacy compounding. The 2007 legislation was sponsored by Senator Ted Kennedy and co-sponsored by Senators Pat Roberts and Richard Burr. The bill previously failed to become law. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) called for stronger federal oversight of
compounding pharmacies. In a letter to the FDA, Senator Blumenthal states:
“This tragic incident calls for stronger oversight, more exacting standards and stricter enforcement of consumer and patient protections related to compounding pharmacies. I remain particularly concerned that compounding, which is intended for individual patient special needs, may have grown more broadly in some instances, into widespread and multi-state distribution."
To read the entire letter click here. Is federal legislation already in the works? What should the federal legislation cover? What should it not cover? How board should it be?
“This tragic incident calls for stronger oversight, more exacting standards and stricter enforcement of consumer and patient protections related to compounding pharmacies. I remain particularly concerned that compounding, which is intended for individual patient special needs, may have grown more broadly in some instances, into widespread and multi-state distribution."
To read the entire letter click here. Is federal legislation already in the works? What should the federal legislation cover? What should it not cover? How board should it be?
No comments:
Post a Comment